Central Asia: Unknown, Combustable, Complicated

Ever since the crisis in Kyrgyzstan began a few months ago, I’ve noticed a growing number of Central Asia “primer” events take place in the D.C. foreign policy scene. I feel it’s an attempt to catch people up on a region that receives little attention in mainstream media and has been set on the backburner of the U.S. foreign policy agenda since the end of the Cold War.

Yes, they say we have a new threat greater than communism now: religious fundamentalism that springs acts of terrorism. And since the U.S. can’t carry all of the problems of the world, naturally, it can’t prioritize regions that are of lesser interest to our immediate needs. Experts at the Atlantic Council argue, however, that Central Asia is key to U.S. interests in “winning” in Afghanistan and maintaining peace in the region.

“It is of the opinion of many that this region will play a significant role in 21st Century relationships. It represents both a threat and tremendous opportunity,” said Senator Chuck Hagel, the chairman of the Atlantic Council.

President of the Atlantic Council, Fred Kempe, pointed to the fact that the U.S. was much more engaged with the region in the 90s. “We were right to focus on it then, and we’re wrong not to now,” he said.

“We need to care for the reasons Sec. James Baker went around to the former Soviet Union in 1991. We were determined never again would our way of life be threatened by a Central Asian country,” said Ambassador Ross Wilson, who was also on the panel. He has also served as an Ambassador to Turkey and Azerbaijan.

He went on to say that after 9/11, we lost touch with personal diplomacy and focused on military efforts, even in Afghanistan. Now that Kyrgyzstan is in a delicate position, he argues that it’s our responsibility to ensure a stable, democratic government can form. At the same time, who’s responsibility is it to seal the fate of Kyrgyzstan? The OSCE, led by Kazakstan? Uzbekistan? Russia? Or the people themselves?

An audience member who is a professor at Georgetown University said there is a dire need for a public diplomacy agenda in the region, which would include trips to the area for non-crisis or military purposes. He said the State Department sent him to Kyrgyzstan in October and that was the first time in its 17 years of independence that a representative was sent to the country for public diplomacy.

While the talk reflected many other talks I’ve heard recently, it did make me wonder if the U.S. would ever put Central Asia back on the forefront of foreign policy. The region is vital to our sustenance in Afghanistan (I’m sure they benefit financially from the war) and it is now a region “in transit” facing new political figures, acts of ethnic violence and religious fundamentalism.

For highlights and a podcast of the event, go to the Atlantic Council site.


One thought on “Central Asia: Unknown, Combustable, Complicated

  1. Pingback: Atlantic Council

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s